Translate

Friday, May 31, 2013

Scottish paedophile establishment sets up child-seizing systems






State snoopers checking out new parents


PARENTS are being secretly judged on their views on race and diversity while in hospital with their newborn babies under the SNP Government's latest assault on family life.







During the scheme, parents are secretly monitored by maternity staff to judge their parenting skills
In a further twist, the same health board is asking children - some of them still at nursery school - to rate their parents or carers on a scale of 1-10.

The project is part of the sinister Big Brother-style system of state meddling called Getting It Right For Every Child (GIRFEC) which is being quietly rolled out across Scotland.

Last week, this newspaper exposed the "scary" plans for all children to be given a state guardian - or Named Person - who will have the legal right to tell parents how to raise their offspring.

GIRFEC also includes proposals to store a child's personal details on a series of databases, which can be accessed by social workers, teachers and other officials.

The "parental capacity to provide wellbeing" assessment forms have been introduced in Lanarkshire under a joint programme involving the health board and local councils.

Under one part of the scheme, parents are secretly monitored by maternity staff to assess their suitability for raising children.

If they are deemed to be worthy of further investigation, another form then asks whether or not they "respect and value diversity" and give "due prominence to their racial, ethnic and cultural heritage".

Another part of Lanarkshire's GIRFEC "toolkit" includes a questionnaire children to rate their parents or carers on a scale of 1-10 in a range of different areas.

The youngsters, who can still be at nursery school, are given a series of prompts, including "do you have someone who listens seriously to your opinions and ideas and anything you have to say?".
Midwives shouldn't be lumbered with acting as social workers and parent monitors when they already have important jobs to be getting on with
Emma Carr, deputy director of Big Brother Watch
Emma Carr, deputy director of Big Brother Watch, said: "Why is the Scottish Government so suspicious of parents? Midwives shouldn't be lumbered with acting as social workers and parent monitors when they already have important jobs to be getting on with.

"This sort of heavy handed bureaucracy smacks of treating every new parent as a suspect and the NHS should get on with providing new parents with the best health care and support available, not policing forms about parent's views of diversity.

"Asking nursery aged children for their 'official' views on their parents is a disaster waiting to happen. What happens when children don't receive the toy that they wanted for Christmas? Public authorities should think about what it is they are trying to achieve, rather than sending out intrusive forms to young children and attempting to create creating a generation of sandbox snoopers."

Meanwhile, despite claims that personal details will be not be stored centrally, Lanarkshire's own GIRFEC newsletter - published in March - states that "core data about a child's wellbeing and wider world" will soon be available to teachers at a "click of a button".

GIRFEC is also at an advanced stage in most other council and health board areas across Scotland.

This is despite the fact that the SNP's Children and Young Person's Bill, which sets out much of the legal framework, has yet to be approved by Parliament.

Scottish Conservative health spokesman Jackson Carlaw said: “This is typical of the SNP wanting to probe into people’s lives too deeply.”

A spokesman for NHS Lanarkshire said most mothers and fathers would get a one-part assessment, looking at health concerns and "parenting skills".

However, a "small proportion of families" would be subjected to a "more detailed assessment" by the midwife.

8 comments:

Sheila said...

Thank you for highlighting this issue. Please consider signing and sharing this petition which is helping to get the word out.

https://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/members-of-the-scottish-parliament-reject-girfec-surveillance-and-named-person-for-every-child-in-scotland#supporters

For background information and the latest news please visit this forum thread.

http://www.home-education.biz/forum/general-discussion/12948-big-brother-scotland.html

Lanark said...

South Lanarkshire Council has a Labour majority (holding 22 seats) and is Labour controlled council. Not an SNP run council. GIRFEC originated in 2004 under a Labour run Scottish Government. That Labour administration also were instrumental in the creation of Curriculum for Excrement in 2002. Sorry Curriculum for Excellence is the removal of formal examinations for Standard Grade Levels and replacing those with vague notions about assessing "learning experiences" with vague "outcomes" which might or might not even be measurable, let alone of any worth or have any assessable content.

Sheila said...

Not quite sure what party politics have to do with this...

More about the history of Girfec here:

http://www.home-education.biz/blog/civil-liberties/id-cards-for-babies-the-rest-will-follow

A bit more about CfE here:

http://subrosa-blonde.blogspot.co.uk/2010/11/tales-from-small-country.html

Lanark said...

The article appears to place GIRFEC in a party political context.

ie.//GIRFEC is also at an advanced stage in most other council and health board areas across Scotland.

This is despite the fact that the SNP's Children and Young Person's Bill, which sets out much of the legal framework, has yet to be approved by Parliament.

Scottish Conservative health spokesman Jackson Carlaw said: “This is typical of the SNP wanting to probe into people’s lives too deeply.”//

GIRFEC has been around much longer than the SNP administration in Holyrood which seems to be bearing the brunt of the responsibilty for GIRFEC in the above article. GIRFEC was a 2002 blueprint for a society designed by professional social workers. Massage In Schools. GIRFEC. CfE. All New Labour. Hideous.

Sheila said...

Agreed, but they're all as bad as each other I reckon.

The Tories are pushing the same Blairite crap down South (in cahoots with their Labour chums).

There have been a few developments since this post was published but it is all just more of the same...

http://subrosa-blonde.blogspot.co.uk/2010/12/early-intervention-and-universal.html

Hideous indeed (don't watch that video too close to bed time!).

Anonymous said...

I smell 'common purpose'.
freebornman.

Sheila said...

Yep! Reeks of it...only a part of it mind...

Anonymous said...

It is very obvious what is going on here.

Our government is currently tasked with undermining Christianity, hence their insistence upon homosexual marriage - an attack on marriage – “an institution ordained by God”`.

In my opinion, civil partnerships are not a problem, as a secular human right, but such is the Fabian Socialism drip, drip strategy, to utter degradation.

The wording is the key.

TPTB demand we “respect and value diversity”.

This is not about respecting, or in my case, as a Christian, loving my neighbour as a fellow human being (be they, for example, Muslim or homosexual) but is about ordering (NWO) to have me VALUE their behaviour or practices and beliefs.

I firmly do not “value” a Muslim following Mohamed and I would expect a Muslim to firmly not “value” me following instead, the person of Jesus Christ. I would however hope he might give me airtime to explain why I do, as I would him, should he wish.

The N.W.O. is clearly about being TOLD what you can think AND what you can do.

Screw that! I am a free thinking human being!

So what is “diversity” that we must “value” it?

How long will it be before we are expected to “respect and value” child rape, child marriage or execution of those who do not value a Luciferian (Satanic) doctrine?

TPTB want a degrading society where they can “do as thou will” and that includes not only same sex marriage but child rape (See the Naohide Laws).

Why not marry your horse or as the old joke goes; your German Shepherd?

This scheme is about identifying free thinkers or rather born againers, who, to cut to the chase, are not willing to “respect and value” SIN, much as we acknowledge its existence and our own failings in said regard.

This is clearly about getting a data base of types who do not value SIN that they might be culled as not going to go along with the Jewish supremacist antichrist agenda of - as the old Noel Coward come Monty Python sketches identified – “Anything Goes”.

I say that, having done my research both on the ground and in scripture:

Christ cursed the fig tree – Israel – “May no one ever eat fruit from you again!” He said.


I am satisfied He said so their soon to have murdered Him who was the Son of
God. However they re-established in 1947.

(Mark 11.12-25)

RabbiT





P.S.

I hope I didn’t say Robert Green was banned from the internet but recall it was Rusty.
Robert, I believe, restricted in what he can say.

In his case with Elish, I believe she realises she has made a fool of herself and wants closure. Good, move on, leave the guy alone, and learn.