Thursday, June 30, 2011

The next false flag will be ET....Aliens!

The June 26th Berlin Hoax was a joke to entertain the elite.  But don't worry.  False Flag attacks will be going in a new direction, according to 'Charles' - whoever he is.

The video below came in on TAP comments.  It explains over two hours the viewpoint of a supposed insider turned whistle-blower, called 'Charles'.  It rings true, and is worth a watch.  The 'end of the world scenarios' with dates attached, are nonsense, he says, set up to keep opposition busy and discredit alternative media.  Is Charles himself another story set up to pull the wool?  I'll let you be the judge.

Extract from video -

'Charles' went to Borstal.  He didn't want to be educated, but he still managed to get 87% when he was made to sit a Maths O Level.  He was watched at an early age by some very powerful people who decided to hand him a job handling some of their problems.  He realised he was being groomed for something.

'I did bad things', he says.  The first thing he had to do was to deal with a paedophile, who he 'dealt with'.  'I became very useful in making problems go away - without attracting attention to what is going on.'

'The best way to deal with people is financially - in a very mundane way.' 
'90% of the things I've done are completely legal.  Money, women, etc.'
'I am in the real world. Most people live in a complete fabrication.  They are quite happy not knowing, and don't want to know.'
'I had plenty of people at my disposal, but I always did the things myself, so there was no trouble, no fuss.  I am very trustworthy.  If I agree to make something happen, it will happen.'
'some of the people I work for would be recognised as being in the public domain.  People don't understand the world at all.'

This interview is about who is really controlling the world, how they see things, and trying to quantify the picture.  It's too much to explain in a simple way. 

Let's frame the story around the contact who brought the journalist together with Charles.  The journalist Bill asked how he was put onto him- 'you arrived on my desk,' 'Charles' replied.
'a deal went wrong.  it left me terminally ill.  it changed my outlook.  it was a dastardly deed I did for financial gain.  It deprogrammed me which is why I'm talking now.

someone persuaded me to play golf with a big golfer and I slaughtered him.  It was frowned on.  It drew attention.  It was my first game in my life.  I also found I couldn't do things that I used to be able to do.  The machine gives you things and the machine can take things away from you.

machine?  what machine?

He continues - 'There is ongoing remote connection somewhere controlling my behaviour and performance.'

sometimes Charles strays into the 'weird' which undermines his credibility somewhat.  But keep reading.  He was tortured in Nigeria when a deal went wrong, which broke his health. 

'You can hang someone on their morals easily,' he says.  Good guys are predictable and easy to know their moves.  Bad guys are much harder to deal with - criminals, military people.
I felt I had changed my approach to my work with dealing with you (Bill Ryan) in August 2010.  I told my controllers I was going to talk to you to get control of you.  But in fact I was being changed by talking to you.
RYAN - Was this to do with Project Avalon?  The Amoeba Split?

Project What? (Google if intrigued)

'The 33 blood lines control everything.  I worked for them to make money.  Now I want to kick them in the nuts.'

The 33 roll with laughter at the alternative media.  It's useful disinformation. 

TAP - maybe the recent forecasts of an attack on Berlin was all a big joke to keep the 33 entertained.

Charles continues - 'Nuclear war just isn't going to happen.  Don't worry about it.'

They use dates to discredit alternative the Berlin attack.

GM foods and terminator seeds are the thing to worry about.  ''They'' control the supply of seeds worldwide.  At some point they'll cut off the supply of seeds from those they don't want to survive.  There is a plan to reduce population to a targeted level.

RYAN - The Georgia guidestones state that population will be culled to 500 million.

Why would they do this?

This is mass murder?

CHARLES - No one's holding a gun. 

This is controlling situations so that Darwinian survival takes over, and only the smartest will survive.  If you can farm, you might survive.  If you can't you're lost.  If you cooperate with people you might survive better.

The drug of the masses is television.
Try turning it off for fourteen days and see how they feel about everything.  Peoples' worlds would be completely changed without TV. 

A filter is being created, a bar to jump over, and some will survive and most won't.  It's a Darwinian test being set up for mankind to endure - famine and food shortage - apart from people living within the undergound bases, which are being built for the elites.

The elites believe they will be doing the right thing by starving billions of human beings to death.  In fact it does make sense.  The world needs fixing.  Planet Earth is broken.

'Do you believe this yourself?,' asks Bill.


BILL RYAN (interviewer) - I believe there might be a better way for mankind to solve this problem.

Interviewee - I would agree with you if you could demonstrate such a thing, but all the data shows that the world has become a financial way.


TAP - The elite don't like the things that could easily be done to fix the world, so they prevent them from happening, and think of killing off the competition as their preferred solution, which ensures their own survival.  They created the television/celebrity drug and dumbed people down.  

OK they know stuff about UFOs, ancient Egypt and the pyramids which would raise eyebrows.  But they lack the cultural knowledge to solve problems through cooperation.  They only understand suppression of people while sitting in a secrecy bunker, all constructed from psychopathic bunker culture.  They are not qualified to be in charge of the problems which need a new more cooperative approach.  They live in another world which doesn't understand the real world of people and how they work together.  They know lots but not the key information needed to create a future path - how to change.

UPDATE - More on the threat of the elite releasing a false flag ET event to terrify the people of the world

What has not yet been published, until now, is Charles' response to the piece.

He was so concerned when he read it - in mid-December, before my video interview with him was recorded, and then released on 1 January 2011 - that he asked me privately what Harley Hawkins' background was. He stressed to me personally that this was very highly sensitive, as HH had seemingly accidentally identified all the core ingredients of a coming false flag event intended to establish the ETs as threats.

HH's response to Charles' immediate question - how did he know all this? - was that it 'came to him' intuitively. I fully believe this. No doubt he will respond for himself in this thread.

HH and I both asked Charles if it was okay to publish his comments. Charles said that it was my call: so I decided that I should wait until the 1 January video interview was published, and the dust had settled at least just a little. This is what I've done, with Charles and HH's agreement.

Here is HH's original post. Charles' personal comments are interspersed in bold italic.


The Attack:

This will truly be an international event. But unlike 9-11, which only occurred in the U.S., it will have to be magnitudes bigger (After 9-11, remember the difficulties Bush had in convincing NATO and the allies to join "his war"?). However, even at that it's not going to be that difficult or take that much to convince an unsuspecting world that aliens are attacking. And most everything needed to accomplish such a feat is in place RIGHT NOW. I won't attempt to go into any details of the assault because details have to be always adjustable according to changing events as they occur, but I will list some (possible) things to look for. I will also attempt to list the possible differences in the sequences of events between a Real Enemy attack and a False Flag attack so that when it occurs you may more easily identify which it is.

And please, by all means, feel free to read between the lines!

Either Scenario could begin similarly:

1. A few MAJOR siting events from around the world and broadcast live to the world. (Escalation)

2. A UFO or two is reported as being brought down, with dead and captured-alive aliens. (Escalation)

3. A few of earth's military assets from around the world are reportedly taken out. An F16 here, an F22 there, throw in a few MIGS, and maybe even a ship or two. All with loss of life. (Escalation)

Real Enemy:


1. Take out ALL of earth's satellites - Communications, Radar and Tracking, Space-Based Weapons – All of it including the International Space Station. At this point we will have no more TV coverage unless you have an antenna.

2. Take out earth's air, ground, and sea defenses and Command and Control facilities.

3. Begin taking out earth's infrastructure: Power and water plants, Food supply, etc. (Depending on the aliens agenda or when we surrender.

I need not go any further.

False-Flag Enemy:


1. Take out SOME of earth's satellites (Only Non-Essential). TV will remain intact to afford the highest visibility to the public.

2. Along with the re-entering satellites will come the take-down of the I.S.S. This will be your Major International Event because it will be watched by everyone, on TV. (Maximum Effect).

3. ICBM's in the U.S., and possibly even in the U.K., Russia, or other areas of the world, will be attacked and disabled. Although ICBM's are not defensive systems and cannot be used as interceptors, this will prove to have a great additional effect because the public has already been “conditioned” to possible UFO/ICBM shutdowns.

4. Air battles and missile launches will be witnessed by everyone, but it will all be skewed to depict the earth as “Holding It's Own”. We will see wins here and losses there, but they will want the population to believe that we have a chance at defeating the enemy BECAUSE they want this to be a long-term, long-standing war.

5. Over the years, most freedoms and many lives will be lost. ALL FOR A LIE!

There is one more possibility that I'd like to mention. Has anyone gave much real thought as to why the last Space Shuttle mission marking the end of the Space Shuttle Program has been delayed so many times and for so long? Sure, I know there are sometimes delays. But for six months or more? Also does everyone know who canceled the Space Shuttle Program? No it was NOT Obama. It was Bush! The Shuttle System was conceived exclusively for the building and servicing of the I.S.S., so basically what this means is the end of the shuttles marks the completion and any major servicing of the station. In other words It Is In-Place. Also, wouldn't that be a tremendous “effect” for everyone to see the final shuttle “Shot Down” while on landing approach, say over L.A.?

Now that I have myself completely depressed, as I'm sure you all are also, I think I'd better stop. I REALLY do not enjoy saying this stuff but I also REALLY need to bring it out in the open. This is one of the reasons I was brought here and I am trying to help. The more people who know how to identify and understand these events as they occur, the more that will cry FOUL and say


TAP - I read Kissinger saying something about a false flag alien attack years ago.  You'd think all of this was some kind of a joke, except we know it is only a matter of time before the next false flag attack.  


Single acts of tyranny said...

That would be such a clever FF attack because of course it would be utterly unverifiable and would justify military spending police state forever more.
8:30 AM

Blogger Me said...

I've read elsewhere that the Germans say there was a coded message released on the day that it had been cancelled.

I think this is important, courtesy of Paul Joseph Watson
British Government Devised Propaganda Campaign To Downplay Fukushima
“Internal emails seen by the Guardian show how the business and energy departments worked closely behind the scenes with the multinational companies EDF Energy, Areva and Westinghouse to try to ensure the accident did not derail their plans for a new generation of nuclear stations in the UK,” reports Rob Edwards.

Explains a lot.
3:54 PM

Genetically Designed Flu Virus To Be Created

Dr Craig Venter.  He owns the patents to all the lifeforms he creates.

Dr Venter's team of synthetic genomists has already created bacteria with specially designed properties.  If you think genentically modified agricultural crops are dangerous, how about the flu vaccines coming out next year, which are being created on a computer, and 'printed out' using four elements to construct DNA from nothing.

Novartis will be able to disable the body's own immune response using synthetic vaccines, and make people dependent on medical intervention in perpetuity.  There'll be big money in that.  Why wouldn't they?  If you don't want to get vaccinated, they can even create the flu bug which makes you rush to be helped, using the same computer.  They own the patents to all the synthetic life forms they create.  Be aware.  Don't get hooked.  Imagine the power to hold the whole world to ransom through the tip of a needle.

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

Chicken McCancer

I happened to stumble upon a McDonald’s document listing its ingredients for its popular menu items –
and out of curiosity, I scanned what “Chicken McNuggets” consisted of. To my surprise, the official company document proudly listed the following:
  • “autolyzed yeast extract” – contains free glutamate similar to, and a replacement for, MSG.
  • sodium phosphates – linked to kidney diseases.
  • sodium aluminum phosphate – linked to Alzheimer’s disease.
  • “hydrogenated soybean oil” – contains toxic trans-fatty acids, far more damaging to the heart than any other fat.
  • TBHQ – a petroleum derivative used as a stabilizer in perfumes, resins, varnishes, and oil field chemicals; linked to stomach tumors and DNA damage.
  • “Dimethylpolysiloxane added as an antifoaming agent” – a type of silicone used in caulks and sealants; a filler for breast implants; a key ingredient in “Silly Putty”, a brand of silicone polymers, a children’s toy.
  • HFCS in its barbecue sauce – linked to the deadliest type of cancer, PANCREATIC CANCER.

I would strongly advise those who are McDonald’s regulars to carefully review the ingredients contained in their respective menu favorites, if only to be aware of what they’re ordering and ingesting into their bodies.


"The ingredients listed in the flyer suggest a lot of thought goes into a nugget, that and a lot of corn. Of the thirty-eight ingredients it takes to make a McNugget, I counted thirteen that can be derived from corn: the corn-fed chicken itself; modified cornstarch (to bind the pulverized chicken meat); mono-, tri-, and diglycerides (emulsifiers, which keep the fats and water from separating); dextrose; lecithin (another emulsifier); chicken broth (to restore some of the flavor that processing leeches out); yellow corn flour and more modified cornstarch (for the batter); cornstarch (a filler); vegetable shortening; partially hydrogenated corn oil; and citric acid as a preservative. A couple of other plants take part in the nugget: There's some wheat in the batter, and on any given day the hydrogenated oil could come from soybeans, canola, or cotton rather than corn, depending on the market price and availability.

According to the handout, McNuggets also contain several completely synthetic ingredients, quasiedible substances that ultimately come not from a corn or soybean field but form a petroleum refinery or chemical plant. These chemicals are what make modern processed food possible, by keeping the organic materials in them from going bad or looking strange after months in the freezer or on the road. Listed first are the "leavening agents": sodium aluminum phosphate, mono-calcium phosphate, sodium acid pyrophosphate, and calcium lactate. These are antioxidants added to keep the various animal and vegetable fats involved in a nugget from turning rancid. Then there are "anti-foaming agents" like dimethylpolysiloxene, added to the cooking oil to keep the starches from binding to air molecules, so as to produce foam during the fry. The problem is evidently grave enough to warrant adding a toxic chemical to the food: According to the Handbook of Food Additives, dimethylpolysiloxene is a suspected carcinogen and an established mutagen, tumorigen, and reproductive effector; it's also flammable.

But perhaps the most alarming ingredient in a Chicken McNugget is tertiary butylhydroquinone, or TBHQ, an antioxidant derived from petroleum that is either sprayed directly on the nugget or the inside of the box it comes in to "help preserve freshness." According to A Consumer's Dictionary of Food Additives, TBHQ is a form of butane (i.e. lighter fluid) the FDA allows processors to use sparingly in our food: It can comprise no more than 0.02 percent of the oil in a nugget. Which is probably just as well, considering that ingesting a single gram of TBHQ can cause "nausea, vomiting, ringing in the ears, delirium, a sense of suffocation, and collapse." Ingesting five grams of TBHQ can kill."


F Is For Farage! Look At Those MEP Faces As Their Beloved Euro Sinks Beneath The Waves!

Their faces say it all.  Wonderful to behold.

The people who are bringing us down were not so long ago triumphant at their creation of the world's biggest currency to be.  What a difference today!

Rumpy Pumpy and CND Ashton, initially in triumph at being chosen to lead the world's first mega currency disaster. 

Tuesday, June 28, 2011

On My Mind

British airports irradiate babes

It's three weeks since Owen Paterson wrote to the UK Border Agency on my behalf via Theresa May.  Shane is pregnant.  Her visa travel date expires on July 14th, and yet she is only a few weeks into her first trimester.  Each day is a struggle.  Headaches.  Dizziness.  Throwing up.  Peeing all the time.  Driving her in the car, she feels every jolt and I have to drop speed to 25 mph on country roads, and take roundabouts at 15 mph.  She is in no state to fly back to Manila, or to have her tiny foetus irradiated at British airport departure.

Let's hope we get a reply from UKBA this week.  It is a great worry.  The visa is dated November, but as my invitation letter said Shane would leave on July 14th, that is the date we must leave by unless we get permission for her to stay longer.  If we overstay Shane would be blacklisted and disqualified from any further visa.  To make her fly now would be grossly irresponsible.  We enclosed a GP's letter stating his opinion that Shane should not fly until her 18th week and that only after a further examination, probably around September.

Owen Paterson wrote to Theresa May three weeks ago.  It's time she replied.  Time is passing by.


I've just read The Tap.  At a PBLF meeting this morning I talked to ****** ******, who emphasised how important it is for Shane to leave UK by the visa expiry date.  In his experience, getting off the blacklist status for overstaying is very difficult.

Poor Shane.  It must be rotten to feel so delicate all the time.


Thanks for the reminder.  ******'s advice has been good and bad, in that he is not correct all the time.
It would be good to get Shane off as planned by July 14th, but her first trimester is proving very sensitive for her.
If the Home Secretary is willing to grant an extended stay on medical grounds, that would not be an overstay, as I understand it.

I will call **** ***** for further advice once we have the reply from the Home Office.
If we get no reply, we might have to make Shane leave regardless.  It is not a good idea to move her unless there is really no alternative.

Airport scanners deliver a radiation dose twenty times bigger than 'previously thought'

A young life could be destroyed or impaired easily by moving her too soon.......

UPDATE - Theresa May The Home Secretary has expressed her opinion that Shane can stay until the expiry date of her Visa, and can leave as and when her medical condition permits.  It is a great relief and we are very grateful.

.....some researchers who study radiation's health effects beg to differ. Last April, four imaging experts from the University of California, San Francisco sent a letter of concern to President Obama's science and technology advisor, John Holdren, questioning, "the extent to which the safety of this scanning device has been adequately demonstrated," they wrote. 

They added that it might deliver a concentrated dose of radiation to the skin—necessary to penetrate clothes—that could be "dangerously high," possibly increasing the risk of skin cancer and other cancers in susceptible individuals. They called for an independent panel of experts to review all the risk data including whether the scanners pose a higher risk to certain folks like pregnant women, seniors, children, and teens.

The government declined their request, reiterating that the scans are safe for everyone.

Dr Brenner of Columbia University writes -

'If there are increases in cancers as a result of irradiation of children,  they would most likely appear some decades in the future. It would be prudent  not to scan the head and neck,' he added. 

Read more:


Fearful of provoking further public resistance to naked airport body scanners, the TSA has been caught covering up a surge in cases of TSA workers developing cancer as a result of their close proximity to radiation-firing devices, perhaps the most shocking revelation to emerge from the latest FOIA documents obtained by the Electronic Privacy Information Center.

Monday, June 27, 2011

Are Microwave Ovens Another Source Of Cancer?


It is time to come with a follow up story to further prove that theMicrowave oven is seriously dangerous to people.
It is claimed by Microwave oven producers and even scientists that the Microwave oven is not only ok to use but it is actually even recommended. Some go as far as claiming that it makes the food more healthy. says for example that “microwaving can actually be quite a healthy way to cook” but how could it be healthy when it radiates the food and it destroys vitamins such as Vitamin B12?
It is true that the Microwave oven uses a nonionizing form of radiation which is not as cancerous as the ionizing radiation but still, are you willing to risk your health over a fast way to heat your food? 
There are other ways to heat your food without any risks and controversies.
Some but not all studies suggest that long-term exposure to nonionizing form of radiation may have a carcinogenic effect. Needless to say is that the ionizing radiation is highly carcinogenic (can provoke cancer) and only few exposures to ionizing radiation can result in a random form of cancer. Exposure to ionizing radiation is done when you take an X-Ray for example or by other means.
The Human DNA is very sensible to radiations of any form, so long time exposure to both ionizing and nonionizing radiation can change a cell’s DNA. If this happens, then the cell’s in built instructions about how to live and grow are jumbled around. It is then possible for the cell to do something very different from what it is supposed to do. For example, it may become cancerous and keep reproducing in an uncontrolled way. This could take years to happen but it still means that a cancer may eventually develop.
Now after knowing why the Microwave oven is dangerous it is time to present an experiment conducted at home almost five years ago by Arielle Reynolds from Knoxville, Tennessee.
Below is a science fair project that Arielle Reynolds did. In it she took filtered water and divided it into two parts. The first part she heated to boiling in a pan on the stove, and the second part she heated to boiling in a microwave. Then after cooling she used the water to water two identical plants to see if there would be any difference in the growth between the normal boiled water and the water boiled in a microwave. She was thinking that the structure or energy of the water may be compromised by microwave. As it turned out, even she was amazed at the difference. So if the microwave water kills plants it can definitely hurt people too. It is easy to make this test and moreover, everyone is encouraged to make a similar test and let us know of their results.