Translate

Saturday, February 26, 2011

US Transport Police Pat Down Kids AFTER They Get Off A Train

It's looks a bit pervy all told.  Kids being thoroughly patted down by the TSA, the USA's notorious Transpportation Security Agency.  But just one question.  What's the point with doing all this as people get OFF their train.  This family had just arrived in Savannah, Georgia and were incredulous.  I'm not surprised.  It's down right stupid.  Bhe TSA doesn't care.  Their mission is to induce a spirit if subjugation and subservience in America'population, as the Federal Government readies people for martial law and internment, prior to genocide and depopulation operations.



Global Research -


The Intensive Quiet Preparations for Martial Law
Let us deal first with the preparations for martial law. In late September 2008, at the height of the financial meltdown, The Army Times announced the redeployment of an active Brigade Army Team from Iraq to America, in a new mission that "may become a permanent part of the active Army":
The 3rd Infantry Division’s 1st Brigade Combat Team has spent 35 of the last 60 months in Iraq patrolling in full battle rattle, helping restore essential services and escorting supply convoys.
Now they’re training for the same mission – with a twist – at home.
Beginning Oct. 1 for 12 months, the 1st BCT will be under the day-to-day control of U.S. Army North, the Army service component of Northern Command, as an on-call federal response force for natural or manmade emergencies and disasters, including terrorist attacks… After 1st BCT finishes its dwell-time mission, expectations are that another, as yet unnamed, active-duty brigade will take over and that the mission will be a permanent one... They may be called upon to help with civil unrest and crowd control.[18]
This announcement followed by two weeks the talk of civil unrest and martial law that was used to panic the Congress into passing Paulson’s bailout legislation. Not only that, the two unprecedented events mirror each other: the bailout debate anticipated civil unrest and martial law, while the announced positioning of an active Brigade Combat Team on U.S. soil anticipated civil unrest (such as might result from the bailout legislation).
Then on December 17, 2008, U.S. Northern Command chief General Renuart announced that "the US military plans to mobilize thousands of troops to protect Washington against potential terrorist attack during the inauguration of president-elect Barack Obama."[19]
The U.S. Army War College also raised the possibility of the U.S. Army being used to control civil unrest, according to the Phoenix Business Journal:
A new report by the U.S. Army War College talks about the possibility of Pentagon resources and troops being used should the economic crisis lead to civil unrest, such as protests against businesses and government or runs on beleaguered banks.
"Widespread civil violence inside the United States would force the defense establishment to reorient priorities in extremis to defend basic domestic order and human security," said the War College report.
The study says economic collapse, terrorism and loss of legal order are among possible domestic shocks that might require military action within the U.S.[20]
It is clear that there has been a sustained move in the direction of martial law preparations, a trend that has been as continuous as it has been unheralded. Senator Leahy was thus right to draw our attention to it on September 29, 2006, in his objections to the final form of the Fiscal Year 2007 National Defense Authorization Act, which gave the president increased power to call up the National Guard for law enforcement:
It... should concern us all that the Conference agreement includes language that subverts solid, longstanding Posse Comitatus statutes that limit the military’s involvement in law enforcement, thereby making it easier for the President to declare martial law. There is good reason for the constructive friction in existing law when it comes to martial law declarations.[21]
This quiet agglomeration of military power has not "just growed", like Topsy, through inadvertence. It shows sustained intention, even if no one has made a public case for it.

3 comments:

Tapestry said...

Google won't permit me to edit this post. I apologise for the spelling errors.

Stuart Fairney said...

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized"

They should have quoted the fourth amendment and said arrest me or FO. I would love to see even a politicised court permiting this one.

Tapestry said...

If only the old legal structures still worked. The Patriot Acts and Homeland Security overrides all previous legal safeguards. Congress does as it is bid. The only way back to democracy will be via military coup d'├ętat.

Once they use the army to suppress the civilian population, the army will have to decide what they want - a totalitarian state, or a return to democracy. The instruments of totalitarianism are being constructed in anticipation of this coming confrontation between the country's military and para-military forces.

History has a few examples where the army has resisted totalitarian government. More usually they are part of it. I go back to Cromwell in my thinking, a military leader who believed the King had become too powerful. Had there been secret police functioning, he would have been stopped in his tracks.